Sam Bobroff <sam.bobr...@au1.ibm.com> writes:

> Introduce a new KVM capability, KVM_CAP_PPC_HTM, that can be queried to
> determine if a PowerPC KVM guest should use HTM (Hardware Transactional

Minor nit, "should" should be "can" IMHO.

> Memory).
>
> This will be used by QEMU to populate the pa-features bits in the
> guest's device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sam.bobr...@au1.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> v2:
>
> * Use CPU_FTR_TM_COMP instead of CPU_FTR_TM.

Thanks.

Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>

Or do you want me to merge this before Paul gets back?

> * I didn't unbreak the line, as with the extra characters checkpatch will
>   complain if I do. I did move the break to a more usual place.

I would just ignore checkpatch. But I don't mind that much.

cheers
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to