On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 03:05:25PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> This helps in easily identifying the MMU mode with which the kernel
> is operating.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c | 3 ++-
>  arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-radix.c | 3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c
> index 7e6d38e01645..b90fe2480089 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c
> @@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ static void __init hash_init_partition_table(phys_addr_t 
> hash_table,
>        * For now UPRT is 0 for us.
>        */
>       partition_tb->patb1 = 0;
> -     DBG("Partition table %p\n", partition_tb);
> +     pr_info("Partition table %p\n", partition_tb);
>       /*
>        * update partition table control register,
>        * 64 K size.
> @@ -943,6 +943,7 @@ void __init hash__early_init_mmu(void)
>        */
>       htab_initialize();
>  
> +     pr_info("Initializing hash mmu with SLB\n");

Can we be consistent and use Hash MMU like for Radix MMU below

Balbir Singh
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to