> With the locking changes in 2/2, it will need a new exported function > that does the locking around the call to __*. With that, it'd be easier > to just merge this. > > I.e. __smp_call_function_map() will be the internal (lockless) version, > and you'll end up adding a nonstatic smp_call_function_map() that does > locking and calls the __* one. > > Is that OK with you?
Yup, it's fine. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
