On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 03:54:22PM +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
>eeh_cache.c doesn't build cleanly with -DDEBUG when
>CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT is set, as a couple of pr_debug()s use "%lx" for
>resource_size_t parameters.
>
>Use "%pap" instead, as it's the correct format specifier for types deriving
>from phys_addr_t.
>
>Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com>
>Cc: Russell Currey <rus...@russell.cc>
>Cc: Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c
>index ddbcfab..ceb81a4 100644
>--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c
>+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c
>@@ -114,9 +114,9 @@ static void eeh_addr_cache_print(struct pci_io_addr_cache
>*cache)
> while (n) {
> struct pci_io_addr_range *piar;
> piar = rb_entry(n, struct pci_io_addr_range, rb_node);
>- pr_debug("PCI: %s addr range %d [%lx-%lx]: %s\n",
>+ pr_debug("PCI: %s addr range %d [%pap-%pap]: %s\n",
> (piar->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) ? "i/o" : "mem", cnt,
>- piar->addr_lo, piar->addr_hi, pci_name(piar->pcidev));
>+ &piar->addr_lo, &piar->addr_hi, pci_name(piar->pcidev));
> cnt++;
> n = rb_next(n);
> }
>@@ -159,8 +159,8 @@ eeh_addr_cache_insert(struct pci_dev *dev, resource_size_t
>alo,
> piar->flags = flags;
>
> #ifdef DEBUG
>- pr_debug("PIAR: insert range=[%lx:%lx] dev=%s\n",
>- alo, ahi, pci_name(dev));
>+ pr_debug("PIAR: insert range=[%pap:%pap] dev=%s\n",
>+ &alo, &ahi, pci_name(dev));
> #endif
>
> rb_link_node(&piar->rb_node, parent, p);
>--
>Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
>andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited
>
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
