On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 12:46 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday, June 17, 2016 1:35:35 PM CEST Daniel Axtens wrote: > > > It would be better to fix the sparse compilation so the same endianess > > > is set that you get when calling gcc. > > > > I will definitely work on a patch to sparse! I'd still like this or > > something like it to go in though, so we can keep working on reducing > > the sparse warning count while the sparse patch is in the works. > > I think you just need to fix the Makefile so it sets the right > arguments when calling sparse. > > Something like the (untested) patch below, similar to how we > already handle the word size and how some other architectures > handle setting __BIG_ENDIAN__.
Yep that's clearly better. I didn't know we had separate CHECKER_FLAGS. Daniel can you test that? Arnd we'll add Suggested-by: you, or send a SOB if you like? cheers _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
