FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
[snip]
> Thanks,
>
> Can you try this?
>
>
> diff --git a/lib/iommu-helper.c b/lib/iommu-helper.c
> index e7d8544..495575a 100644
> --- a/lib/iommu-helper.c
> +++ b/lib/iommu-helper.c
> @@ -8,15 +8,20 @@
> static unsigned long find_next_zero_area(unsigned long *map,
> unsigned long size,
> unsigned long start,
> - unsigned int nr)
> + unsigned int nr,
> + unsigned long align_mask)
> {
> unsigned long index, end, i;
> again:
> index = find_next_zero_bit(map, size, start);
> +
> + /* Align allocation */
> + index = (index + align_mask) & ~align_mask;
> +
> end = index + nr;
> - if (end > size)
> + if (end >= size)
> return -1;
> - for (i = index + 1; i < end; i++) {
> + for (i = index; i < end; i++) {
> if (test_bit(i, map)) {
> start = i+1;
> goto again;
> @@ -50,9 +55,8 @@ unsigned long iommu_area_alloc(unsigned long *map, unsigned
> long size,
> {
> unsigned long index;
> again:
> - index = find_next_zero_area(map, size, start, nr);
> + index = find_next_zero_area(map, size, start, nr, align_mask);
> if (index != -1) {
> - index = (index + align_mask) & ~align_mask;
> if (is_span_boundary(index, nr, shift, boundary_size)) {
> /* we could do more effectively */
> start = index + 1;
This on top of -mm? Or on top of the reverted iommu patch.
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
