Darren Stevens <dar...@stevens-zone.net> writes: > Hello Christian
> That's not where I ended up with my bisect, this commit is about 10 before the > one I found to be bad, which is: > > commit d6a9996e84ac4beb7713e9485f4563e100a9b03e > Author: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Date: Fri Apr 29 23:26:21 2016 +1000 > > powerpc/mm: vmalloc abstraction in preparation for radix > > The vmalloc range differs between hash and radix config. Hence make > VMALLOC_START and related constants a variable which will be runtime > initialized depending on whether hash or radix mode is active. > > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > [mpe: Fix missing init of ioremap_bot in pgtable_64.c for ppc64e] > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> > Can you check the value of ISA_IO_BASE where you are using it. If you are calling it early, you will find wrong value in that. With the latest kernel it is a variable and is initialized in hash__early_init_mmu(); -aneesh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
