On Tue, 2016-16-02 at 06:31:53 UTC, Oliver O'Halloran wrote: > There is a switch fallthough in instr_analyze() which can cause > an invalid instruction to be emulated as a different, valid, > instruction. The rld* (opcode 30) case extracts a sub-opcode from > bits 3:1 of the instruction word. However, the only valid values > of this field a 001 and 000. These cases are correctly handled, > but the others are not which causes execution to fall through > into case 31. > > Breaking out of the switch causes the instruction to be marked as > unknown and allows the caller to deal with the invalid instruction > in a manner consistent with other invalid instructions. > > Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <ooh...@gmail.com>
Applied to powerpc next, thanks. https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/ab66c8ca52f790d816e421d3b1 cheers _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
