On 05/05/16 16:50, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-05-03 at 15:32 -0700, Tyrel Datwyler wrote: >> On 04/27/2016 
> 10:34 PM, Suraj Jitindar Singh wrote: >>> diff --git 
> a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c 
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c >>> index ceb18d3..a560a98 100644 
> >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c >>> +++ 
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c >>> @@ -191,8 +191,8 @@ static 
> int update_dt_node(__be32 phandle, s32 scope) >>>                  break; >>> 
>  >>>              case 0x80000000: >>> -                prop = 
> of_find_property(dn, prop_name, NULL); >>> -                
> of_remove_property(dn, prop); >>> +                of_remove_property(dn, 
> of_find_property(dn, >>> +                            prop_name, NULL)); >>>  
>                 prop = NULL; >>>                  break; >>> >> >> You 
> haven't removed a NULL check here, as suggested by the changelog, >> but 
> instead made a cosmetic change to the code that still leaves behind >> a now 
> unnecessary "prop = NULL;" to bit rot. > > Yeah I think you're right. Though 
> it's not
very clear how prop is used in that > function. > > Please one of you send me 
an incremental to remove the prop = NULL; > > cheers >

I didn't delete the prop = NULL; initially as I didn't fully understand
how it was used in the rest of the function and the effect of deleting
it.

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to