* Rob Herring <robh...@kernel.org> [160420 16:48]:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert+rene...@glider.be> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+rene...@glider.be>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi
> > index ce1e242d4dc07ea8..8b797915300894d8 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi
> > @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
> > abb_mpu_iva: regulator-abb-mpu {
> > compatible = "ti,abb-v1";
> > regulator-name = "abb_mpu_iva";
> > - #address-cell = <0>;
> > + #address-cells = <0>;
>
> dtc should flag this if it was really needed. However, it looks like
> it isn't as there are no child nodes (unless the board files add
> them).
>
> A nice dtc check would be to flag unnecessary #address-cells or
> #size-cells. That would only help here after your fix though.
Yeah. Applying patches 2 - 4 into omap-for-v4.7/dt thanks.
Tony
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
