On 2016年04月08日 15:47, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 02:41:46PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>> From: pan xinhui <xinhui....@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> Implement xchg{u8,u16}{local,relaxed}, and
>> cmpxchg{u8,u16}{,local,acquire,relaxed}.
>>
>> Atomic operation on 8-bit and 16-bit data type is supported from power7
>
> And yes I see nothing P7 specific here, this implementation is for
> everything PPC64 afaict, no?
>
Hello Peter,
No, it's not for every ppc. So yes, I need add #ifdef here. Thanks for
pointing it out.
We might need a new config option and let it depend on POWER7/POWER8_CPU or
even POWER9...
> Also, note that you don't need explicit 8/16 bit atomics to implement
> these. Its fine to use 32bit atomics and only modify half the word.
>
That is true. But I am a little worried about the performance. It will forbid
any other tasks to touch the other half word during the load/reserve, right?
I am working on the qspinlock implementation on PPC.
Your and Waiman's patches are so nice. :)
> Also, you might want to invest in some CPP to reduce the endless
> repetition.
>
Will do that. thanks for your tips.
thanks
xinhui
> Other than that, no objections :-)
>
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
