On 4/1/16 7:41 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
On 2016/03/31 10:52AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On 3/31/16 4:25 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
...
+
+#ifdef __powerpc__
+#define BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) { (ip) = (ctx)->link; }
+#define BPF_KRETPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx)
+#else
+#define BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx)
\
+ bpf_probe_read(&(ip), sizeof(ip), (void *)PT_REGS_RET(ctx))
+#define BPF_KRETPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx)
\
+ bpf_probe_read(&(ip), sizeof(ip), \
+ (void *)(PT_REGS_FP(ctx) + sizeof(ip)))
makes sense, but please use ({ }) gcc extension instead of {} and
open call to make sure that macro body is scoped.
To be sure I understand this right, do you mean something like this?
+
+#ifdef __powerpc__
+#define BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) ({ (ip) = (ctx)->link;
})
+#define BPF_KRETPROBE_READ_RET_IP BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP
+#else
+#define BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) ({
\
+ bpf_probe_read(&(ip), sizeof(ip), (void *)PT_REGS_RET(ctx)); })
+#define BPF_KRETPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) ({
\
+ bpf_probe_read(&(ip), sizeof(ip),
\
+ (void *)(PT_REGS_FP(ctx) + sizeof(ip))); })
+#endif
yes. Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
