On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 13:52 +1100, Russell Currey wrote: > On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 11:38 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-22-03 at 00:34:55 UTC, Russell Currey wrote: > > > > > > + case RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN+2: > > > + mwait = 100; > > > + break; > > > + default: > > > + goto err; > > > + } > > > + > > > + max_wait -= mwait; > > > + msleep(mwait);
> > Can you use rtas_busy_delay() ? > > Wasn't aware of that, makes life a lot easier. Do you know if the 0.2s > maximum delay also applies across the board? I definitely want to enforce > it here, but if it is ubiquitous then it should be in rtas_busy_delay. Not sure sorry, you'll have to read PAPR :) cheers _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
