On Sat, 2016-03-19 at 09:37 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 15:04 +1100, Michael Neuling wrote: > > > > static int nr_chips; > > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, chip_id); > > > > /* > > * Note: The set of pstates consists of contiguous integers, the > > @@ -317,9 +318,7 @@ static void powernv_cpufreq_throttle_check(void > > *data) > > > > pmsr = get_pmspr(SPRN_PMSR); > > > > - for (i = 0; i < nr_chips; i++) > > - if (chips[i].id == cpu_to_chip_id(cpu)) > > - break; > > + i = this_cpu_read(chip_id); > > Except it's not a chip_id, so your patch confused me for a good 2mn > ... > Call it chip_idx maybe ? ie, index.
Yeah, it was a badly named variable but I changed it even more and Shilpasri rebased it here: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/599523/ Mikey _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
