On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 10:14 +0100, Frederic Barrat wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Le 09/03/2016 06:55, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> > This breaks the SMP=n build: > > Arg! I'm adding it to my checklist. Don't worry about it too much. It's pretty obscure, and I have an automated test for it. We've broken the SMP=n build in the past for *months* at a time and no one's noticed. > Thanks for the fix. No worries. cheers _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
