On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 06:47:39PM +0530, Ashish kumar wrote:
> B4860 has 1 PPC core cluster and 3 DSP core clusters.
> Similarly B4420 has 1 PPC core cluster and 1 DSP core cluster.
>
> Each DSP core cluster consists of 2 SC3900 cores and a shared L2 cache.
>
> Add DSP clusters for B4420
> The L2 cache nodes such that they now appear in only the
> soc specific dtsi files(b4860si-post.dtsi and b4420si-post.dtsi).
>
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kumar <ashish.ku...@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shaveta Leekha <shaveta.lee...@nxp.com>
The subject line is way too long, and has a non-standard prefix.
It should be something like "powerpc/fsl: Add DSP clusters and their L2 nodes"
> +
> + dsp-clusters {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + dsp-cluster0 {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + compatible = "fsl,sc3900-cluster";
> + reg = <0>;
> +
> + dsp0: dsp@0 {
> + compatible = "fsl,sc3900";
> + reg = <0>;
> + next-level-cache = <&L2_2>;
> + };
> + dsp1: dsp@1 {
> + compatible = "fsl,sc3900";
> + reg = <1>;
> + next-level-cache = <&L2_2>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
Where is the binding for this stuff?
Why "dsp-cluster0" instead of "dsp-cluster@0"?
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
