On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:12:08AM -0600, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 09:54:15AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 18, 2007, at 6:01 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:36:27 +1100
> > > Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I am considering raising the limit on the size of postings to
> > >> 400k. Does
> > >> anyone have a real problem with this? Limiting message size was
> > >> done to
> > >> limit the damage of larges spams (and we don;t get very many of
> > >> those on
> > >> the list) and to ease the pain for people downloading emails over a
> > >> slow
> > >> (like dialup) link (and are there many of those left?).
> > >
> > > Fine by me!
> >
> > Do you really have patches that are 400k?
>
> I'm guessing stuff such as "dtc merge" could reach those sizes?
dtc merge was 224k, if it had stayed together with the libfdt merge it
would have been a about 300k.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
