So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled: > The remaining old-style tree checking code: check_root(), check_cpus() > and check_memory() really aren't that useful. They mostly check for > the presence of particular nodes and properties. That's inherently > prone to false-positives, because we could be dealing with an > artificial tree (like many of the testcases) or it could be expected > that the missing properties are filled in by a bootloader or other > agent. > > If any of these checks really turns out to be useful, we can > reimplement them later in a better conceived way on top of the new > checking infrastructure. For now, just get rid of them, removing the > last vestiges of the old-style checking code (hoorah). > > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied. Thanks, jdl _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
