David Gibson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 04:54:27PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [snip] >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/adder875-redboot.dts >> b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/adder875-redboot.dts >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..4d28220 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/adder875-redboot.dts > [snip] >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/adder875-uboot.dts >> b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/adder875-uboot.dts >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..33d198c >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/adder875-uboot.dts > > Having two different device trees for the different firmwares is > pretty yucky, and could be a pain in the bum for synchronization of > fixes.
Yes, that's why we need some sort of macro/template facility in dtc. :-) > Can't you have a common tree, and just poke the places that > are differently configured by the two firmwares from the bootwrapper. Enh. That can get icky as well, and the bootwrapper isn't necessarily even used for u-boot, and I'd rather not require it be used just for this. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
