On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 12:58:26PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> As requested, compatible is used rather than name for probing.
> The simple-bus name comes from ePAPR drafts.
>
> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8313erdb.dts | 38
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc8313_rdb.c | 16 ++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8313erdb.dts
> b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8313erdb.dts
> index c5b6665..66b53ec 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8313erdb.dts
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8313erdb.dts
> @@ -45,10 +45,48 @@
> reg = <00000000 08000000>; // 128MB at 0
> };
>
> + localbus {
Should be "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "fsl,mpc8313-elbc", "fsl,elbc", "simple-bus";
> + reg = <e0005000 1000>;
> + interrupts = <d#77 8>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&ipic>;
> +
> + // CS0 and CS1 are swapped when
> + // booting from nand, but the
> + // addresses are the same.
Should the bootwrapper have some kind of fixup to poke in the correct
chipselect values based on the state?
Or should we have a function to fill in the elbc's ranges property
based on the bridge control registers, as we do for the ebc on 4xx.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
