On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:37:26 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 15:11 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > > Well, there is physical PCI hardware on the boards, yes. But what if > > people have no intention of using it? E.g. they have no devices, etc. > > Now we're requiring PCI support to be built into the kernel. > > > > I'm just being pedantic about keeping embedded tiny. > > Keeping your embedded design tiny (and thus your own BSP) is one thing, > but adding ifdef's all over the place so that somebody can tinify an > eval board, I'm less sure about this... but if you want, you can fixup > my patches. I'm not really advocating for ifdefs. If it annoys me enough (which I doubt it will), then I'd try to come up with some way to avoid those too. For now, I think selecting PCI in Kconfig for those boards is OK. josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
