Yes. According to the PCI spec, a PCI device can request multi MSI interrupts and require that interrupts are consecutive. But it is ok if only allocate one to it. Anyway, the hwirq should be allocated from bitmap instead of increment by hand.
I will correct this and resend the patch. - Tony On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 15:51 +0800, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > I'm not sure what you mean? For MSI there is only one MSI per > device, > > but this code is used also for MSI-X which supports > 1 MSI per > device. > > Or more specifically, for MSI, -linux- supports only one per device > (in > theory, it's possible to have multiple MSI non-X but it's a mess). > > > Either way we shouldn't be incrementing hwirq by hand, it's > reassigned > > at the top of the loop. I think that's left over from old code that > > allocated nvec hwirqs in a block and then created virq mappings for > each > > one, whereas the new code allocates each hwirq separately. > > > > cheers > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > > Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev > _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
