On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 01:58:06PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > On 11/21/07, Cyrill Gorcunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This patch does fix missed increment on counter > > > > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > Sorry for that nonstandart patch submission - I've only access > > to gmail with Internet Explorer on my work. If that is not OK - will resend > > the patch today evening with mutt. > > > > > Oops - it seems the patch is corrupted a bit. Drop it please - will > resend today evening. Sorry.
Thanks for the fix, but please cc the maintainer (me) next time, as well as the arch list (linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org)? That loop could actually even easier be converted to a for_each_compatible_node() iteration. There's never more than one interface on the current boards but it's still nicer coding. Thanks, -Olof _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
