On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:15:48 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007 8:18 PM, Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 19:44 +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote: > > > NFSv2/3 and NFSv4 share the same dentry_iput and so share the same > > > unlink and sillyrename logic. > > > But they do not share nfs_init_server()! > > > > > > I wonder why this doesn't blow up more violently, but only hangs... > > > > > > But as I don't know if it is correct to add the workqueue > > > initialization to nfs4_init_server() or remove the nfs_sb_active / > > > nfs_sb_deactive for the NFSv4 case, I can't offer a patch to fix this. > > > > > > Torsten > > > > I had already fixed that one in my own stack. Attached are the 3 patches > > that I've got. 1 from SteveD, 2 fixes. > > > > Moving the init_waitqueue_head() like patch > linux-2.6.24-006-fix_to_fix_sillyrename_bug_on_umount.dif and applying > linux-2.6.24-007-fix_nfs_free_unlinkdata.dif lets my testcase work. > Also lockdep no longer complains about the non-static key. > Thanks. To avoid goofups, could you please send the full fix against 2.6.24-rc2-mm1? _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
