David Gibson wrote: >> How hard would it be to get libfdt to dynamically allocate any extra space >> it needs? This is a regression from the current flat device tree code... > > Uh.. it already does. Or rather, the shims in libfdt-wrapper.c do so, > when libfdt functions which can expand the tree report that they've > run out of room.
Ah, good -- I was looking in libfdt itself, not the wrapper. Now if only we could get something similar into u-boot... maybe libfdt proper could accept an optional realloc() function pointer in fdt_init(), and eliminate the need for the caller to provide such a wrapper? -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
