Jean Delvare wrote: >>>> We might as well just use i2c_new_device() instead of messing around >>>> with bus numbers. Note that this is technically no longer platform >>>> code, so it's harder to justify claiming the static numberspace. >>> I was allowing control of the bus number with "cell-index" and >>> i2c_add_numbered_adapter(). >>> Should I get rid of this and switch to i2c_add_adapter()? >> Yes. > > No! If you don't call i2c_add_numbered_adapter() then new-style i2c > clients will never work on your i2c adapter.
I thought that was what i2c_new_device() was for? By handling all the device tree stuff in the driver, it acts more like an add-on adapter than a platform device. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
