On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:02:40 -0800 Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul's concern is, since we didn't need it so far - why we need this > for hotplug memory remove to work ? It might break API for *unknown* > applications. Its unfortunate that, hotplug memory add updates > /proc/iomem. We can deal with it later, as a separate patch. > I have no objection to skip /proc/iomem related routine when arch doesn't need it.
My advice is just "please take care both of hot-add and hot-remove". If ppc64 people agreed to use arch-specific routine for detect conventional memory, there is no problem, I think. Thanks, -Kame _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
