On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:56:51 -0500
Olof Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 10:08:05AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 07:56:50PM +0300, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> > > PowerPC 440GRx Rainier DTS.
> > [snip]
> > > + SDRAM0: sdram {
> > > + device_type = "memory-controller";
> >
> > How many times do we need to say it...
> >
> > Don't make up random device_type values. This does not belong here.
>
> Maybe there should be something like checkpatch.pl that warns about
> these kinds of things so people can check for it without getting flamed
> first. :-)
That's actually a decent idea. We could even have this thing that
takes DTS files and processes them... oh wait.
So why can't we make a whitelist of "allowed" device_types in DTC and
make it whine about anything outside of that?
josh
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
