On Saturday 27 October 2007 14:55:49 Vitaly Bordug wrote: > On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 14:42:49 +0200 > Michael Buesch wrote: > > > It calls the "mkimage" command, which does not exist > > in my $PATH. > > > well, mkImage is a part of u-boot and there was some talk to make it part of > kernel too, > since it does not take alot of place but still mandatory for a number of > platforms to work. > > I think, Paul will clarify the details, meanwhile you can install mkImage say > building u-boot, and > some distros may have such a package. >
Ubuntu doesn't seem to, though. In any case, I think that the name "mkimage" is bad for a tool installed globally in /usr. Does it make a iso9660 image? (No it doesn't, I know :) ) I'd vote for shipping it with the kernel in /scripts or something like that. -- Greetings Michael. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
