> So Ben suggested what we really want is two routines, > of_get_pci_dev_node() and of_peek_pci_dev_node() - the former returning > a refcounted copy and the latter allowing you to "peek" at the > device_node as long as you own the pci_dev. > > I'm not sure it's worth the churn really, so we should probably just > document that pci_device_to_OF_node() is contrary, and any users that > need a reference can take one explicitly.
Yeah, I pretty much made the same decision a couple of years ago which is why it's still the way it is now :-) Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
