Hi Guennadi, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > (it was suggested to deprecate -embedded in favour of -dev, so, added to > cc:) > > On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Grant Likely wrote: > >> On 10/19/07, Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> is it forseen to define and configure devices like RTC, temperature >>> sensors or EEPROM on the I2C bus with the Flat Device Tree? If yes, how >>> would the DTS entries look like? >> booting-without-of.txt has some information about describing the controller. >> >> Scott Wood made an attempt at defining a device binding for I2C >> devices, but it has not been merged into booting-without-of.txt yet. >> I've copied what he wrote below. I would add to his definition the >> following: >> - If compatible is missing, driver should *not* fall back to the device name. >> - 'compatible' list should include the exact device in the form >> "<mfg>,<part>" > > There are also already working examples in powerpc: look at > arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c at the i2c_devices[] array and how it is > used below. There are also some .dts examples upstream already, e.g., > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/kuroboxH[GD].dts. There also have been more patches > recently to add further devices to the table and further .dts entries. > Notice however, it would be good to move the generic code out of > fsl_soc.c, as there seems to be increasing interest in describing i2c > buses in .dts.
Ah, nice. I checked a few dts files but obviously missed the one for the kuroboxH[GD]. Thanks, Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
