On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 12:43:13PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hrm.... I'm very dubious about this.
What compiler/platform is this? I can't off the top of my head think
of one where size_t shouldn't be promoted to int automatically.
Or there's the %z modifier, which explicitly specifies a size_t, but
I'm not sure if that's C99 or a glibc extension.
> ---
> tests/get_name.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/get_name.c b/tests/get_name.c
> index 2481741..a76bdf8 100644
> --- a/tests/get_name.c
> +++ b/tests/get_name.c
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ void check_name(void *fdt, const char *path)
>
> if (len != strlen(getname))
> FAIL("fdt_get_name(%s) returned length %d instead of %d",
> - path, len, strlen(getname));
> + path, len, (int) strlen(getname));
>
> /* Now check that it doesn't break if we omit len */
> getname2 = fdt_get_name(fdt, offset, NULL);
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
