On Oct 18, 2007, at 10:29 AM, Li Yang-r58472 wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 10:57 PM >> To: Li Yang-r58472 >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/9] ipic: add new interrupts >> introduced by new chip >> >> >> On Oct 18, 2007, at 10:04 AM, Li Yang wrote: >> >>> These interrupts are introduced by the latest Freescale SoC such as >>> MPC837x. The patch also adds comment to interrupts. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Li Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> --- >>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c | 224 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> +---------- >>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.h | 7 +- >>> include/asm-powerpc/ipic.h | 12 ++- >>> 3 files changed, 186 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) >> >> see comments: >> >> http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-October/044636.html > > But you didn't answer to my feedback > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-October/044711.html
sorry missed this. > If you are so persistent on thinking it's harmful rather than useful, > please at least attempt to persuade me. The MPC5121e users the IPIC and has different interrupt assignment. I suggest that the UMs be updated to more useful not the code. - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
