Hello.
Paul Mackerras wrote:
>> I'd use (evt - 1) since the interrupt gets generated at 0xffffffff count,
>>not 0 (on classic CPUs). With you removing of the code that compensated for
> See commit d968014b7280e2c447b20363e576999040ac72ef; I already fixed
> that.
BTW, while fixing that for classic PPC, but you've broke it for 40x / book
E CPU which interrupt at 0. Congratulations. :-)
WBR, Sergei
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
