Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Note: I use msleep_interruptible(1); just like napi_disable(). However > I'm not too happy that the "hot" loop that results of a pending signal > here will spin without even a cpu_relax ... what do you guys think would > be the best way to handle this ?
Well since the loop does not check signals at all, it should just use msleep. Granted the process will end up in the D state and contribute to the load average. But if this loop executes long enough for that to be noticed then we've got bigger problems to worry about. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
