My nits:

Grant Likely wrote:
> From: Sylvain Munaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> +static int __devinit
> +bcom_engine_init(void)

Why "bcom" and not "bestcomm"?

> +     /* Disable COMM Bus Prefetch, apparently it's not reliable yet */
> +     /* FIXME: This should be done on 5200 and not 5200B ... */
> +     out_be16(&bcom_eng->regs->PtdCntrl, in_be16(&bcom_eng->regs->PtdCntrl) 
> | 1);

This really, really shouldn't even be here, could it be moved to a platform
init, or switched on a PVR/SVR here?

> +int bcom_sram_init(struct device_node *sram_node, char *owner)
> +{
> +     int rv;
> +     const u32 *regaddr_p;
> +     u64 regaddr64, size64;
> +     unsigned int psize;
> +
> +     /* Create our state struct */
> +     if (bcom_sram) {
> +             printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bcom_sram_init: "
> +                     "Already initialiwed !\n", owner);
> +             return -EBUSY;
> +     }

initialised or initialized :)

> +             printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bcom_sram_init: "
> +                     "Couln't request region !\n", owner);
> +             rv = -EBUSY;
> +             goto error_free;

Couldn't or could not.

-- 
Matt Sealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to