My nits: Grant Likely wrote: > From: Sylvain Munaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > +static int __devinit > +bcom_engine_init(void)
Why "bcom" and not "bestcomm"? > + /* Disable COMM Bus Prefetch, apparently it's not reliable yet */ > + /* FIXME: This should be done on 5200 and not 5200B ... */ > + out_be16(&bcom_eng->regs->PtdCntrl, in_be16(&bcom_eng->regs->PtdCntrl) > | 1); This really, really shouldn't even be here, could it be moved to a platform init, or switched on a PVR/SVR here? > +int bcom_sram_init(struct device_node *sram_node, char *owner) > +{ > + int rv; > + const u32 *regaddr_p; > + u64 regaddr64, size64; > + unsigned int psize; > + > + /* Create our state struct */ > + if (bcom_sram) { > + printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bcom_sram_init: " > + "Already initialiwed !\n", owner); > + return -EBUSY; > + } initialised or initialized :) > + printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bcom_sram_init: " > + "Couln't request region !\n", owner); > + rv = -EBUSY; > + goto error_free; Couldn't or could not. -- Matt Sealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev