On Thursday 11 October 2007, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 10:49 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > > > + PowerPC,[EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> > > > + device_type = "cpu";
> > > > + reg = <0>;
> > > > + clock-frequency = <0>; /* Filled in by U-Boot */
> > >
> > > Filled in by U-Boot itself? Or by a cuboot wrapper? (which I can't
> > > find in the patches.)
> >
> > By U-Boot itself. I have a U-Boot patch in the queue to add device tree
> > support for 4xx. Therefor I don't plan adding a cuboot wrapper for
> > Kilauea.
>
> Very cool!
You can take a look at the kilauea-405ex branch of my 4xx custodian repository
for a latest development snapshort:
http://www.denx.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=u-boot/u-boot-ppc4xx.git;a=shortlog;h=kilauea-405ex
> > > > + interrupt-parent = <&UIC1>;
> > > > +
> > > > + [EMAIL PROTECTED],0 {
> > >
> > > You have no ranges property for the ebc parent node. Is if filled in
> > > by U-Boot? If so, please add a comment because otherwise I don't see
> > > how this mapping will work.
> >
> > Yes, it's filled in by U-Boot too. I'll add a comment here.
>
> Ok.
>
> > > No chosen node?
> >
> > No. U-Boot will provide all needed information here.
>
> Does it provide it by creating the chosen node? Or by still using the
> bd_t method?
bd_t? What's that? ;)
Best regards,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
