Hi Olof, On Monday 08 October 2007, Olof Johansson wrote: > > +config KILAUEA > > + bool "Kilauea" > > + depends on 40x > > + default y > > + select 405EX > > + help > > + This option enables support for the AMCC PPC405EX evaluation board. > > + > > #config REDWOOD_5 > > # bool "Redwood-5" > > # depends on 40x > > @@ -89,14 +97,17 @@ config 403GCX > > #depends on OAK > > select IBM405_ERR51 > > > > +config 405EP > > + bool > > + > > +config 405EX > > + bool > > + > > Do you really need config options for 405EP/EX? I don't seem them used > anywhere else in the code (and it's also contradictory to the whole new > multiplatform way of looking at stuff :). > > I know the 405/440 is still somewhat #ifdef:ed on the cpu here and there, > but since this doesn't add any such code I don't see a need for the config > options?
Yes, I'm still used to needing these defines from arch/ppc (for example for the 4xx EMAC driver). But its possible, that we really don't need it at all in arch/powerpc with all the device tree information. Not sure though. Josh, what do you think? Should I remove the 405EX define completely? Best regards, Stefan _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
