On Sep 28, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > The way the current CPM binding describes available multi-user (a.k.a. > dual-ported) RAM doesn't work well when there are multiple free > regions, > and it doesn't work at all if the region doesn't begin at the start of > the muram area (as the hardware needs to be programmed with offsets > into > this area). The latter situation can happen with SMC UARTs on > CPM2, as its > parameter RAM is relocatable, u-boot puts it at zero, and the > kernel doesn't > support moving it. > > It is now described with a muram node, similar to QE. The current CPM > binding is sufficiently recent (i.e. never appeared in an official > release) > that compatibility with existing device trees is not an issue. > > The code supporting the new binding is shared between cpm1 and > cpm2, rather > than remain separated. QE should be able to use this code as well, > once > minor fixes are made to its device trees. > > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
applied. - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
