On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 08:54 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > It shoudn't normally happen. The reason it -does- happen in fact is > that > the above node is also missing the #interrupt-cells property, which > cause the parent-lookup routine to skip it before it gets a chance to > see that there's an "interrupt-controller" property in there. > > I'm not sure whether linux behaviour is a bug or not since I believe > we > are clearly in undefined-land as an interrupt controller should always > have a #interrupt-cells property.
That's btw something we could add as a warning to dtc... A node with "interrupt-controller" or "interrupt-map" in it should always have a #interrupt-cells property. Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
