On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 03:13:22PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:52:06 +1000 David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > libfdt.h currently includes fdt.h, then libfdt_env.h.  This is
> > incorrect, because depending on the environment into which libfdt is
> > embedded, libfdt_env.h may be needed to define datatypes used in
> > fdt.h.  This patch corrects the problem.
> 
> So why doesn't fdt.h include libfdt_env.h, then?

Because libfdt_env.h is specifically for libfdt, whereas fdt.h
contains passive structures only, related to the flat tree structure
but without reference to any particular code for handling it.

Basically, fdt.h includes no other headers as a compromise to make it
more easily usable in various contexts.  In fact the only thing it
needs is the C99 fixed-width integer types, but I want it to be also
usable in contexts which don't have a <stdint.h> (e.g. the kernel
bootwrapper).

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to