Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 25.09.2007 16:29:51:
> The description makes it sound like a git-bisect would get broken
> by this patch, which should never happen. If the patch indeed
> ends up with a broken kernel, it would be better to merge it with
> the later patch that fixes the code again.
I took extra care to prevent just that from happening. ibmebus will simply
be disabled during the transition (because of {un,}register_driver being
empty dummies), but the kernel builds and boots without problems. So
unless you're trying to find an ibmebus-based problem, git bisect will be
fine. I'll repost 2/5 with an updated description.
I split the ibmebus rework into three patches because the merged patch was
impossible to read. Makes reviewing easier.
Joachim
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
