Hi,
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-25 21:45]:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:23:02 +0200 Bernhard Walle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This patch adapts the ppc64 code to use the generic parse_crashkernel()
> > function introduced in the generic patch of that series.
>
> I really don't like to see patches get a wholesale replacement, especially
> when they've been looked at by a few people and have had some testing, etc.
> It's not possible to see what changed and people need to re-review stuff
> they've already reviewed, etc.
Sorry, I didn't know that this is the preferred way. I just thought
it's more clear if the patches are replaced if the patch set is
finally pushed into Linus' tree.
> diff -puN
> arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c~use-extended-crashkernel-command-line-on-ppc64-update
> arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> ---
> a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c~use-extended-crashkernel-command-line-on-ppc64-update
> +++ a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ NORET_TYPE void machine_kexec(struct kim
>
> void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> {
> - unsigned long long crash_size = 0, crash_base;
> + unsigned long long crash_size, crash_base;
> int ret;
>
> /* this is necessary because of lmb_phys_mem_size() */
> _
>
>
> which I suspect will now create a compiler warning.
No, it doesn't. I just verified this.
CHK include/linux/compile.h
CC arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.o
LD arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o
Thanks,
Bernhard
--
Bernhard Walle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Architecture Maintenance
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
OpenPGP: F61F 34CC 09CA FB82 C9F6 BA4B 8865 3696 DDAF 6454
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
