On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 05:09:01PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 05:23 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> ...
> > > There are not only Bamboo board running PIBS, but running U-Boot too. How
> > > should we handle this different FLASH partitioning? Same goes for Ebony
> > > too
> > > btw.
> >
> > That's a good question. I'm working on making the NOR flash show up for
> > Bamboo right now, and I had intended to just leave the partition
> > subnodes missing.
>
> Maybe we can have U-Boot add the partition information if it's
> missing in the device tree, and extend the mtdparts command in U-Boot
> to add / adjust settings so they match what is defined in U-Boot.
>
> Stefan, what do you think?
If U-Boot is supplying a device tree, it should certainly make the
partition information match its own idea of the partitions.
For older non-device-tree away u-boot, I guess we'll have to make the
cuboot and treeboot wrappers mangle the device tree differently to
correct the partition information.
I suspect the easiest way to do this will be for the dts to contain
both treeboot and u-boot partition info, and have the wrapper delete
or nop the nodes for the other firmware.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
