On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 11:53:30AM -0700, Eugene Surovegin wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 01:52:02PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > This patch reworks existing ibm-iic driver to an of_platform_device
> > and enables it to talk to device tree directly. The ocp quirks are
> > completely removed by this patch.
> > 
> > This is done to enable I2C support for the PPC4xx platforms now
> > being moved from arch/ppc (OCP) to arch/powerpc (of). The first board
> > using this driver will be the AMCC Sequoia (PPC440EPx).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > ---
> > 2nd try with some cleanups. Please let me know if there still are some
> > problems.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > commit 5748f81ff53277fa5c16de815b7d6b172ca284e9
> > tree 8284b3f1c836eb6eb06ee6882ee13b9e8f6cbb6b
> > parent d0174640eedc1cd756754f03afe2dbb3d56de74e
> > author Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 16 Sep 2007 13:46:40 +0200
> > committer Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 16 Sep 2007 13:46:40 +0200
> > 
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig       |   12 -
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile      |    1 
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ibm_iic.h |    3 
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ibm_of.c  |  858 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  4 files changed, 873 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> > index 9f3a4cd..12453e2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> > @@ -220,7 +220,17 @@ config I2C_PIIX4
> >  
> >  config I2C_IBM_IIC
> >     tristate "IBM PPC 4xx on-chip I2C interface"
> > -   depends on IBM_OCP
> > +   depends on !PPC_MERGE
> > +   help
> > +     Say Y here if you want to use IIC peripheral found on 
> > +     embedded IBM PPC 4xx based systems. 
> > +
> > +     This driver can also be built as a module.  If so, the module
> > +     will be called i2c-ibm_iic.
> > +
> > +config I2C_IBM_OF
> > +   tristate "IBM PPC 4xx on-chip I2C interface"
> > +   depends on PPC_MERGE
> >     help
> >       Say Y here if you want to use IIC peripheral found on 
> >       embedded IBM PPC 4xx based systems. 
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
> > index 5b752e4..0cd0bac 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_HYDRA)           += i2c-hydra.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_I801)             += i2c-i801.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_I810)             += i2c-i810.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_IBM_IIC)  += i2c-ibm_iic.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_IBM_OF)   += i2c-ibm_of.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_IOP3XX)   += i2c-iop3xx.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_IXP2000)  += i2c-ixp2000.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_IXP4XX)   += i2c-ixp4xx.o
> 
> Hmm, I just noticed that you basically added a copy of existing 
> driver with small changes to support OF while keeping OCP one.
> 
> Why not just add OF support to the existing code (under some ifdef), 
> and then remove OCP support as soon as ppc -> powerpc transition is 
> finished? Why have two almost identical code in the tree?
> 
> I also personally don't like this _iic -> _of name change (you 
> removed peripheral name and added something which has nothing to do 
> with iic, I never heard of OF peripheral in 4xx chips). Whether you 
> use OCP or OF to pass a little information is quite irrelevant to the 
> iic driver operation.

I concur on this point.  Especially since on 4xx the device tree will
generally be a flattened device tree which is vaguely OF-like, but not
from an actual Open Firmware.

> If you insist on this approach, please add yourself as a maintainer of 
> this code, because I'm not going to support two identical copies of my 
> code in the kernel tree.
> 

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to