Grant Likely wrote: > > No, they are explicitly numbered. Are you looking at the 5200 or the > 5200B user manual?
MPC5200B User's Manual, Rev. 1.3 (MPC5200BUM.pdf) > In my copy, on page 7-17, I see this: Ah! 7-20 here. Do we have different revisions of the manual, perhaps? :) PSa0 in > peripheral interrupt 0 (l2=0), PSa23 is peripheral interrupt #23 > (l2=23) > > Bits Name > 8 PSa23 BestCom So, the numbering of the interrupts is not derived from anything but the "Name" field in those tables? 0 1 3 would be Slice Timer 0, 1 0 3 would be Slice Timer 1 (main, interrupt 0, we always use 3 on Efika for some reason) and 1 9 3 would be TMR0? PCI control and initiator interrupts would be 2 (8,9,10) 3? Well, this certainly makes a lot more sense, at least in terms of deriving the numbers, however it looks like it's a fairly nonsensical numbering system to be fair. -- Matt Sealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
