From: Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It makes sense to stop the SPU processes as soon as possible. Also if we
dont acquire_saved() I think there's a possibility that the value in
csa.priv2.spu_lslr_RW won't be accurate.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/coredump.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/coredump.c
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/coredump.c
index 6663669..21283f6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/coredump.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/coredump.c
@@ -135,7 +135,9 @@ static int spufs_arch_notes_size(void)
fd = 0;
while ((ctx = coredump_next_context(&fd)) != NULL) {
+ spu_acquire_saved(ctx);
rc = spufs_ctx_note_size(ctx, fd);
+ spu_release_saved(ctx);
if (rc < 0)
break;
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
