On Sep 13, 2007, at 11:05 AM, Scott Wood wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 01:39:58AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> +   CS: chipselect {
>>
>> We need to document this in booting-without-of.
>
> OK.

cool.  Want to make sure we can encompass the 83xx/85xx/86xx local  
bus in there.

>>> +           PIC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
>>> +                   #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>>> +                   interrupt-controller;
>>> +                   reg = <10c00 80>;
>>> +                   compatible = "fsl,mpc8280-pic", "fsl,pq2-pic";
>>
>> this should also have a "fsl,cpm2-pic" or something of that form.
>> (exact same pic exists on 8560, 85xx+CPM)
>
> OK...  I did it as pq2 rather than cpm2 because IIRC it wasn't  
> described
> under the CPM section of the manual, so I didn't know if 85xx CPM2 had
> the same thing.

No problem.  The cpm2_* code in the kernel is used on 85xx's that  
have a CPM and I don't think we have that much ifdef for 85xx  
specific CPM foo.  Only thing I can think of is this bit in cpm2.h:

#if defined(CONFIG_8272) || defined(CONFIG_MPC8555)
#define CPM_DATAONLY_SIZE       ((uint)(8 * 1024) - CPM_DATAONLY_BASE)
#define CPM_FCC_SPECIAL_BASE    ((uint)0x00009000)
#else

- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to