On Tuesday 11 September 2007 16:51, Nathan Lynch wrote: > > - get_paca()->paca_index, __FUNCTION__, \ > > + smp_processor_id(), __FUNCTION__, \ > > I think I see these macros used in preemptible code (e.g. ehca_probe), > where smp_processor_id() will print a warning when > CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y. Probably better to use raw_smp_processor_id.
You're right, man. The processor id doesn't need to be preemption-safe in this context, so that would be a bogus warning. Thanks for pointing this out. I'll post a new version of this patch. Joachim _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
