In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:20:32 +0200 Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 12:04:39PM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > > The "tty: termios locking functions break with new termios type" patch
> > > (f629307c857c030d5a3dd777fee37c8bb395e171) breaks the powerpc compile.
> > > [...]
> > > I'm guessing other architectures are broken too?
> >
> > FWIW, the above quoted patch breaks s390 as well.
>
> Does this fix it?
FYI it does fix powerpc, but I suspect you were asking about s390 here.
Mikey
>
> diff -puN drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c~powerpc-add-new-required-termio-functions
drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c
> --- a/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c~powerpc-add-new-required-termio-functions
> +++ a/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c
> @@ -795,6 +795,19 @@ int n_tty_ioctl(struct tty_struct * tty,
> if (L_ICANON(tty))
> retval = inq_canon(tty);
> return put_user(retval, (unsigned int __user *) arg);
> +#ifndef TCGETS2
> + case TIOCGLCKTRMIOS:
> + if (kernel_termios_to_user_termios((struct termios __us
er *)arg, real_tty->termios_locked))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + return 0;
> +
> + case TIOCSLCKTRMIOS:
> + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> + return -EPERM;
> + if (user_termios_to_kernel_termios(real_tty->termios_lo
cked, (struct termios __user *) arg))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + return 0;
> +#else
> case TIOCGLCKTRMIOS:
> if (kernel_termios_to_user_termios_1((struct termios __
user *)arg, real_tty->termios_locked))
> return -EFAULT;
> @@ -806,6 +819,7 @@ int n_tty_ioctl(struct tty_struct * tty,
> if (user_termios_to_kernel_termios_1(real_tty->termios_
locked, (struct termios __user *) arg))
> return -EFAULT;
> return 0;
> +#endif
>
> case TIOCPKT:
> {
> _
>
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
